PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 04:10:45

Claude Opus 5.5 scores 58 on Intelligence Index, doubling median for reasoning models

Claude Opus 5.5 has achieved a score of 58 on Artificial Analysis's Intelligence Index, significantly outperforming the median score of 26 for comparable reasoning models. This indicates a substantial leap in its reasoning capabilities. AI

IMPACT Sets a new benchmark for reasoning capabilities, potentially influencing future model development and evaluations.

RANK_REASON The item reports on a benchmark score for an AI model, which falls under research. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on Mastodon — mastodon.social →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

Claude Opus 5.5 scores 58 on Intelligence Index, doubling median for reasoning models

How we ranked this

Signal score
3 / 100
Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket
Tool
The item reports on a benchmark score for an AI model, which falls under research. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
Source corroboration
Single-source cluster
Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics
model release
Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance
High
Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness
Breaking (< 6h)
Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.

Full methodology in our editorial standards.

COVERAGE [1]

  1. Mastodon — mastodon.social TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] ·

    Claude Opus 5.5 scores 58 on Artificial Analysis's Intelligence Index, more than double the median of 26 for comparable reasoning models. That is the figure tha

    Claude Opus 5.5 scores 58 on Artificial Analysis's Intelligence Index, more than double the median of 26 for comparable reasoning models. That is the figure that gets quoted. It also tells you the least about what the model costs to run. The same evaluation run that produced the …