A user expressed significant disappointment after subscribing to ChatGPT Plus specifically to use Codex for coding assistance, finding it inferior to their existing tool, Cursor. The user cited issues with Codex's lack of visual code changes, slow processing times, inconsistent results that ignored project patterns, and a high consumption of their usage limits. Despite trying a top-tier model, the experience was poor, leading the user to regret the purchase and prefer waiting for their Cursor subscription renewal. AI
IMPACT Highlights user experience differences between AI coding assistants, suggesting Cursor offers superior integration and efficiency for developers.
RANK_REASON User opinion piece on a product comparison.
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →