A new study published on arXiv explores how novice users calibrate their reliance on AI tools when making decisions without immediate performance feedback. The research indicates that AI explanations can inadvertently lead to over-reliance among users. However, higher self-reported understanding of the task is associated with more selective and appropriate reliance on AI assistance. AI
IMPACT Findings suggest a need for careful design of AI explanations to prevent over-reliance and ensure appropriate user calibration in decision-making tasks.
RANK_REASON The cluster contains a research paper published on arXiv detailing findings about human-AI interaction. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
- AI explanations
- alphaXiv
- artificial intelligence
- arXiv
- CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers
- Connected Papers
- CORE Recommender
- DagsHub
- Gotit.pub
- Hugging Face
- Influence Flower
- Litmaps
- reliance calibration
- ScienceCast
- scite Smart Citations
- self-assessment
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →