New research reveals structural limits in AI uncertainty decomposition

A new paper published on arXiv by Jakob Christensen analyzes the standard information-theoretic framework for decomposing machine learning uncertainty into aleatoric (AU) and epistemic (EU) components. The research identifies critical issues of entanglement and epistemic collapse, demonstrating that significant portions of the assumed AU and EU ranges are infeasible in finite settings. The findings reveal that the infeasible region scales with the number of classes and Monte Carlo samples, and can explain epistemic collapse when model confidence is high. The paper suggests that increasing ensemble size can reduce this infeasible area and cautions against interpreting AU and EU as independent quantities in low AU regimes. AI

IMPACT Highlights fundamental limitations in AI uncertainty estimation, potentially impacting model reliability and interpretability.

RANK_REASON Academic paper published on arXiv detailing theoretical findings in machine learning uncertainty. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on arXiv cs.CV →

• alphaXiv
• arXiv
• CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers
• CORE Recommender
• DagsHub
• Gotit.pub
• Hugging Face
• Influence Flower
• Jakob Christensen
• ScienceCast

• paper
• safety

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →