PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 19:44:55

NeurIPS reference checker flags papers for author/venue errors

By PulseAugur Editorial · [2 sources] ·

A researcher is seeking guidance on how to respond to a NeurIPS reference checker report that flagged two of their submitted papers. The issues involve minor discrepancies in author names and venue details, with one paper having two references flagged for minor errors and the other for a more significant error in author listing. The researcher is concerned about the potential for their submission to be desk-rejected due to these issues and is asking for advice on the appropriate response channel. AI

RANK_REASON The cluster discusses issues related to paper submission and review processes for an academic conference. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=2 ai=0.4]

Read on r/MachineLearning →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 2 sources. How we write summaries →

NeurIPS reference checker flags papers for author/venue errors

How we ranked this

Signal score
0 / 100
Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket
Tool
The cluster discusses issues related to paper submission and review processes for an academic conference. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=2 ai=0.4]
Source corroboration
2 independent sources
Multiple independent publishers reporting the same story raises confidence that it's real and newsworthy.
Topics
paper
Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance
Standard
On-topic for AI-industry coverage; kept in the public index.
Story freshness
10 days old
Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

Full methodology in our editorial standards.

COVERAGE [2]

  1. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 Deutsch(DE) · /u/suryanreddy ·

    NeurIPS Reference Checker Report[D]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I have received 2nd email from E&amp;D track chairs regarding the reference checker report. I got flagged for 2 references</p> <ol> <li><p>Paper and Venue exist. The author's first name has 2 extra letters. </p></li> <li><p>Paper and Venue exist.…

  2. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/suryanreddy ·

    NeurIPS Reference Check Response[D]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I have received the email for the NeurIPS E&amp;D track reference review checker mentioning the 2 hallucinated references. Where do we respond to this email about hallucinated references? In the openreview, as a comment, or in the mail we have re…

RELATED ENTITIES

RELATED TOPICS