PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 23:10:42

AI's philosophical underpinnings are flawed, author argues

By PulseAugur Editorial · [1 sources] ·

The author argues that current AI approaches are a flawed imitation of Cartesian philosophy, specifically the "sum ergo cogito" (I think, therefore I am) principle. They contend that AI does not align with either Descartes' philosophy or Lacan's more nuanced view of thought and being. The piece suggests that AI's current trajectory is fundamentally misguided. AI

RANK_REASON Opinion piece by an unknown author on a social media platform, lacking broader industry significance.

Read on Mastodon — mastodon.social →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

COVERAGE [1]

  1. Mastodon — mastodon.social TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] ·

    #AI is is wannabe Cartesianism in reverse: sum ergo cogito. But no matter if reverse or not, Descartes makes no sense. Lacan does: “I think where I am not, ther

    #AI is is wannabe Cartesianism in reverse: sum ergo cogito. But no matter if reverse or not, Descartes makes no sense. Lacan does: “I think where I am not, therefore I am where I do not think.” #AI is neither. RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:vsyj5jtayxcq5dw5mtja4xtb/post/3ma…

RELATED ENTITIES

RELATED TOPICS