PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 01:26:14
日本語(JA) 生成AIの回答に引用元がないということは技術的にあり得ない🤖 出典を明記するのは企業としても表現・言論のルールとしても当然なのはもちろん、出典が歴史史料の場合だけでなく、現存するクリエイターの著作であっても使用した以上は明記してもらわないと困る :blobcatpolice: このままではクリエイターが手塩にかけて書い

Mastodon user criticizes generative AI for lacking citations

By PulseAugur Editorial · [1 sources] ·

A Mastodon user expressed concern that generative AI models lack citations, which they argue is technically impossible and ethically problematic. The user emphasized that citing sources is crucial for both corporate responsibility and freedom of expression, especially when AI models use existing creators' works. Without proper attribution, creators' labor could be exploited for free by large tech companies. AI

IMPACT Highlights concerns about intellectual property and creator compensation in the context of generative AI.

RANK_REASON Opinion piece from a user on a social media platform about AI ethics.

Read on Mastodon — mastodon.social →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

Mastodon user criticizes generative AI for lacking citations

How we ranked this

Signal score
2 / 100
Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket
Commentary
Opinion piece from a user on a social media platform about AI ethics.
Source corroboration
Single-source cluster
Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics
opinion, other
Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance
Standard
On-topic for AI-industry coverage; kept in the public index.
Story freshness
Breaking (< 6h)
Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.

Full methodology in our editorial standards.

COVERAGE [1]

  1. Mastodon — mastodon.social TIER_1 日本語(JA) · [email protected] ·

    It is technically impossible for generative AI to not cite its sources 🤖 It is natural for companies to clearly state sources, as well as for rules of expression and speech, and it is problematic if sources are not cited when used, not only for historical materials but also for existing creators' works. If this continues, creators who have painstakingly written...

    生成AIの回答に引用元がないということは技術的にあり得ない🤖 出典を明記するのは企業としても表現・言論のルールとしても当然なのはもちろん、出典が歴史史料の場合だけでなく、現存するクリエイターの著作であっても使用した以上は明記してもらわないと困る :blobcatpolice: このままではクリエイターが手塩にかけて書いた（作った）仕事が巨大ITのためのタダ働きになってしまう :Shiropuyo_komaru: https:// kozuehinatsu.com/all-about-gen erative-ai/ # fedibird # ai # 生成…

    LINKS kozuehinatsu.com/all-about-generative-ai

RELATED ENTITIES

RELATED TOPICS