A new audit of AI-powered search tools like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview reveals significant concentration in the sources they cite for mental health information. The study found that just ten domains accounted for over 43% of English citations, with government, commercial health, and academic sources being nearly equally represented. While explicit requests for sources had a modest impact, non-English queries resulted in fewer citations and lower rates of routing to relevant language resources. The researchers have released their citation typology, classifier, and annotated corpus for future auditing of generative health search. AI
IMPACT Highlights potential biases and lack of source diversity in AI-generated health information, urging caution for users and developers.
RANK_REASON Academic paper detailing an audit of AI search tools. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
- alphaXiv
- arXiv
- CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers
- ChatGPT
- Connected Papers
- CORE Recommender
- DagsHub
- Google AI Overview
- Gotit.pub
- Hugging Face
- Litmaps
- mental health
- Perplexity
- ScienceCast
- scite Smart Citations
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →