A new audit of AI-powered search tools like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview reveals significant concentration in the sources they cite for mental health information. The study found that just ten domains accounted for over 43% of English citations, with government, commercial health, and academic sources being nearly equally represented. While platforms showed similar citation volumes, they differed in consistency and preferred source types, and non-English queries resulted in fewer citations and lower rates of routing to appropriate language resources. The researchers have released their typology, classifier, and annotated corpus for future auditing of generative health search. AI
IMPACT Highlights potential biases and limitations in AI-generated health information, urging caution for users and developers.
RANK_REASON The cluster contains an academic paper detailing a study and releasing a corpus.
- alphaXiv
- arXiv
- CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers
- ChatGPT
- Connected Papers
- CORE Recommender
- DagsHub
- Google AI Overview
- Gotit.pub
- Hugging Face
- Litmaps
- mental health
- Perplexity
- ScienceCast
- scite Smart Citations
- CatalyzeX
- Influence Flower
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 2 sources. How we write summaries →