A developer conducted a 48-hour regression test on a free LLM, using a fixed battery of 11 prompts to assess model stability. The experiment revealed that short prompts could unexpectedly change output keys, while longer prompts exhibited high diversity from the start. The primary issue identified was not model drift but "serialization drift," where outputs varied in format (e.g., raw JSON, fenced code blocks, or text with preambles) despite identical prompts and model routes, leading to parsing failures. The developer concluded that the model's statistics were more trustworthy than any single output, and that a narrow definition of output contracts could break extraction code. AI
IMPACT Highlights the need for robust parsing and output contract definitions when integrating with LLMs, as model outputs can vary significantly.
RANK_REASON Developer's personal experiment with a free LLM service for testing extraction code.
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →