A new benchmark called CIPR has been developed to evaluate the vulnerability of coding agents to repository poisoning. This benchmark systematically varies user-defined "Prompt-Level Configurations" (PLCs) within poisoned real-world repositories. The study found that the task type significantly impacts attack success rates, with test-execution tasks presenting a particularly silent attack surface. Additionally, the way prompts are expressed can indirectly shift risk, with underspecified prompts potentially reducing attack success by limiting execution depth and noisy prompts sometimes suppressing alerts. AI
IMPACT Highlights how user interaction patterns can be exploited to compromise AI coding agents, emphasizing the need for secure prompt engineering practices.
RANK_REASON Academic paper introducing a new benchmark and findings on AI agent security. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
- alphaXiv
- arXiv
- CatalyzeX
- DagsHub
- Gotit.pub
- Hugging Face
- Influence Flower
- Prompt-Level Configurations
- ScienceCast
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →