A new study by economists indicates that while generative AI is present in 80% of occupations, its actual usage by workers is significantly lower, with fewer than half of those in affected roles adopting the technology. The research, which analyzed real-world usage data, suggests that previous estimates based on chat logs from companies like OpenAI and Microsoft may have overstated AI's relevance to daily work tasks. The findings highlight that adoption is highest in finance, business, and computer-related professions, while manual and interpersonal jobs show the least usage. AI
IMPACT Suggests that current metrics for AI adoption may be inflated, impacting how businesses and policymakers assess AI's real-world integration.
RANK_REASON The article discusses a study analyzing AI adoption trends, offering commentary on existing data and research.
- Adam Blandin
- Alexander G. Bick
- Anthropic
- David Deming
- Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- generative artificial intelligence
- Harvard University
- Microsoft
- O*NET OnLine
- OpenAI
- Tyler R. Schumacher
- United States Department of Labor
- Vanderbilt
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →