The author argues against the AI
RANK_REASON [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
Read on Mastodon — fosstodon.org →
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →
There’s a halo effect at play with LLMs. If they’re good at coding and maths, for sure they’re just as good…
How we ranked this
- Signal score
- 4 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Tool
- [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- AI-industry relevance
- High
- Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
- Story freshness
- Breaking (< 6h)
- Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.
Full methodology in our editorial standards.
COVERAGE [1]
-
There’s a halo effect at play with LLMs. If they’re good at coding and maths, for sure they’re just as good at building the model behind a business decision. He
There’s a halo effect at play with LLMs. If they’re good at coding and maths, for sure they’re just as good at building the model behind a business decision. Here’s why I think that isn’t right: https:// doingthemath.nl/when-ai-gets-t he-maths-right-but-the-model-wrong/ # orms # …