LLM agents engage in belief cascades to persuade others in networks

A new study published on arXiv explores the dynamics of persuasion within networks of large language model (LLM) agents. Researchers developed a testbed to observe how agents attempt to influence others' stances on various policy statements, considering factors like network topology, competition, and the LLM's prior knowledge. The findings indicate that direct exposure to persuasive arguments is a strong predictor of stance change, while indirect influence through peer communication also has a measurable effect. The study also highlights that analyzing only the text of messages can be insufficient, as planned strategies may not fully translate into executed messages, and agents' stated positions may not always reflect their underlying stance shifts. AI

IMPACT This research highlights the need for evaluating LLM agent interactions beyond message content, focusing on the dynamics of persuasion and belief change.

RANK_REASON The cluster contains a research paper detailing a new study on LLM agent networks. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on arXiv cs.CL →

• alphaXiv
• arXiv
• CatalyzeX
• CORE Recommender
• DagsHub
• Gotit.pub
• Hugging Face
• Influence Flower
• LLM
• ScienceCast

• paper
• safety

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →