New research evaluates RAG pipelines, balancing performance and efficiency

A new paper evaluates different retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines, comparing traditional text-based methods with newer multimodal approaches that utilize vision-language models. The research analyzes the trade-offs between retrieval quality, computational cost, and memory usage for various textual and multimodal pipelines, including dense and late-interaction architectures. The authors propose a data-driven methodology to help practitioners select the most effective RAG pipeline based on their specific document corpus and resource constraints. AI

IMPACT Provides guidance for selecting optimal RAG pipelines, balancing performance with computational efficiency for various document types.

RANK_REASON The cluster contains a research paper published on arXiv detailing evaluations of RAG pipelines. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on arXiv cs.IR (Information Retrieval) →

• alphaXiv
• arXiv
• CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers
• Connected Papers
• CORE Recommender
• DagsHub
• Gotit.pub
• Hugging Face
• Influence Flower
• Litmaps
• retrieval-augmented generation
• ScienceCast
• scite Smart Citations
• Vision--Language Models

• paper
• infra

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →