A user on r/MachineLearning is questioning whether the Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) conference will provide a meta-review for submitted papers. The user expresses frustration, stating that their paper, which had positive recommendations from an Area Chair (AC), was intentionally given low scores by reviewers. They are seeking clarity on whether EMNLP's decision not to provide a meta-review is based on these low scores, as it impacts their next steps for resubmission. AI
RANK_REASON User expresses opinion and frustration about a conference's review process.
- Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
- Metareview on short-term effectiveness and safety of antidepressants for depression: an evidence-based approach to inform clinical practice.
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →