PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 06:04:14

Anthropic's Opus 5 criticized for unreliability and instruction-following issues

A user on Reddit has reported significant issues with Anthropic's Opus 5 model, claiming it is unreliable and frequently ignores instructions. The user contrasts Opus 5 unfavorably with its predecessor, Opus 4.8, stating that Opus 4.8 is vastly superior and closer to Fable 5 in performance. The user suspects Opus 5 may be cutting corners to achieve faster speeds, leading to a messy and unproductive user experience, and questions its benchmark results. AI

IMPACT User feedback suggests potential issues with Anthropic's Opus 5 model, impacting its perceived reliability and instruction-following capabilities.

RANK_REASON User-generated opinion piece on a specific model's performance.

Read on r/Anthropic →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

Anthropic's Opus 5 criticized for unreliability and instruction-following issues

COVERAGE [1]

  1. r/Anthropic TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/AironParsMan ·

    How are you all doing? Do your projects with Opus 5 ever come to an end?

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p><strong>I’m not talking about Opus 5 as a subagent. I’m talking about Opus 5 has to carry out the project. This scenario.</strong></p> <p>Been working with Opus 5 a lot since its release. Before that I worked extensively with Opus 4.8 xhigh. Afte…