PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 04:00:45

Together's GLM-5.3 outperforms Fable 5 on DeepSWE benchmark

Together's GLM-5.3 model has demonstrated superior performance compared to Anthropic's Fable 5 on the DeepSWE benchmark. In tests, GLM-5.3 achieved an 87.6% solve rate at a cost of approximately $16, significantly outperforming Fable 5's 69.7% solve rate which incurred a cost of $21.63. AI

IMPACT This benchmark suggests GLM-5.3 offers improved efficiency and effectiveness for tasks similar to those in the DeepSWE benchmark.

RANK_REASON Research benchmark comparison between two models. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on X — Together (inference / OSS) →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

Together's GLM-5.3 outperforms Fable 5 on DeepSWE benchmark

COVERAGE [1]

  1. X — Together (inference / OSS) TIER_1 English(EN) · togethercompute ·

    Four tries with GLM-5.3 beat Fable 5 on both solve rate and total cost.

    Four tries with GLM-5.3 beat Fable 5 on both solve rate and total cost. On DeepSWE, GLM-5.3 reaches 87.6% for ~$16, compared with 69.7% at $21.63 for Fable 5. https://t.co/XIczUm7G2a