A scoping review of 174 studies reveals a wide array of artificial intelligence tools used for screening titles and abstracts in systematic reviews. The research highlights significant heterogeneity in these AI tools and the metrics employed for their evaluation. Consequently, there is a clear need for standardization in how these tools are assessed and for maintaining human oversight in the review process. AI
IMPACT Highlights the need for standardized evaluation of AI tools in research, impacting how AI is integrated into academic workflows.
RANK_REASON The cluster is based on a published academic paper (scoping review). [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
Read on Mastodon — mastodon.social →
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →
