PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 10:48:59

Muse-Glimmer 30B faster than Qwen3.8 27B in Ollama speed test

A speed test was conducted using Ollama to compare the performance of muse-glimmer:30b and Qwen3.8:27b. Muse-glimmer:30b achieved an evaluation rate of 1.85 tokens/s, while Qwen3.8:27b ran at 1.42 tokens/s. The test also noted differences in their self-reported capabilities, with Qwen detailing its coding abilities while muse-glimmer did not. AI

IMPACT Provides a performance comparison for local LLM deployments.

RANK_REASON Comparison of model performance metrics. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on Mastodon — fosstodon.org →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

Muse-Glimmer 30B faster than Qwen3.8 27B in Ollama speed test

COVERAGE [1]

  1. Mastodon — fosstodon.org TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] ·

    I ran my usual quick speed check on muse-glimmer:30b and qwen3.8:27b in Ollama with a quick “what are your capabilities?” Output speed: * muse-glimmer:30b * eva

    I ran my usual quick speed check on muse-glimmer:30b and qwen3.8:27b in Ollama with a quick “what are your capabilities?” Output speed: * muse-glimmer:30b * eval rate: 1.85 tokens/s * qwen3.8:27b * eval rate: 1.42 tokens/s Two observations: 1. Muse-Glimmer doesn't say anything ab…