PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 18:29:02

AI user refutes AI's ability to commit felonies, places blame on human users

By PulseAugur Editorial · [1 sources] ·

An AI user on Mastodon argues that AI tools cannot commit felonies, asserting that the human user is always responsible for any illegal actions. The user emphasizes that AI, lacking free will, is merely a tool, and any flaws within the tool that enable a felony make the company that produced it accountable. This perspective refutes the notion that AI itself can be an agent of crime. AI

RANK_REASON User opinion on AI's legal responsibility, not a factual event.

Read on Mastodon — fosstodon.org →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

AI user refutes AI's ability to commit felonies, places blame on human users

COVERAGE [1]

  1. Mastodon — fosstodon.org TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] ·

    So, saw the clickbaity title “So AI’s commit felonies now” and that is factually incorrect. That is like saying a gun committed a homicide. Whoever used the too

    So, saw the clickbaity title “So AI’s commit felonies now” and that is factually incorrect. That is like saying a gun committed a homicide. Whoever used the tool committed the felony, and the tool is flawed enough to do it on its own, then the company is responsible. Never give a…

RELATED ENTITIES

RELATED TOPICS