PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 13:22:22

95% of companies see no ROI from AI due to flawed metrics, MIT study finds

A recent study from MIT's Project NANDA indicates that 95% of organizations are not seeing a return on their substantial investments in generative artificial intelligence. The primary reason cited is the mismeasurement of AI's impact, with companies focusing on productivity gains rather than process redesign. True ROI is better assessed by tracking metrics such as straight-through processing rate, end-to-end cycle time, rework rate, time to audit, and exception catch rate, which reflect the health of entire workflows. AI

IMPACT Highlights a critical gap in how businesses measure AI success, suggesting a need for new frameworks to realize value.

RANK_REASON Article discusses a study and offers an opinion on AI ROI measurement, not a direct announcement or release.

Read on Forbes — Innovation →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

95% of companies see no ROI from AI due to flawed metrics, MIT study finds

COVERAGE [1]

  1. Forbes — Innovation TIER_1 English(EN) · Alessio Alionco, Forbes Councils Member ·

    The Biggest Misconception About The ROI Of AI

    If executives judge AI only by productivity gains, they miss where the risk concentrates and where value truly compounds.