PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 09:59:21

AI-generated phishing messages found comparable to human-authored ones

A pilot study published on arXiv investigated the effectiveness of AI-generated spear-phishing SMS messages compared to those written by humans. Researchers used GPT-4 to create personalized messages and compared them to messages written by novice students. The study found that GPT-4 messages elicited an intention to click slightly more often than human-authored messages, though the difference was not statistically significant. Participants were also unable to accurately distinguish between AI-generated and human-written messages, suggesting that AI could increase the scale of social-engineering threats. AI

IMPACT Suggests AI could increase the scale and effectiveness of social-engineering attacks, highlighting the need for improved detection methods.

RANK_REASON Academic paper detailing a study on AI-generated content. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on arXiv cs.AI →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

AI-generated phishing messages found comparable to human-authored ones

COVERAGE [1]

  1. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Jerson Francia, Derek Hansen, Benjamin Schooley, Matthew Taylor, Shydra Valynn Murray, Rebekah Cornelius, Greg Snow ·

    Assessing AI-Generated vs. Human-Authored Spear Phishing SMS Attacks: An Empirical Study

    arXiv:2406.13049v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Personalized phishing is difficult to defend against because messages can be tailored to a target's work, interests, and social context. Large language models may make such tailoring faster and easier, but it remains uncle…