PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 12:59:48

AI outputs should be watermarked with pride if they were good, user claims

By PulseAugur Editorial · [1 sources] ·

A user on Mastodon humorously suggests that if AI were truly advanced, its outputs would be "watermarked" with pride, akin to a signature. The post implies that current generative AI is not good enough for users to openly claim its output, contrasting its potential access to vast information with its perceived inferiority to human creation. AI

RANK_REASON User opinion piece on AI watermarking, not a factual event.

Read on Mastodon — fosstodon.org →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

AI outputs should be watermarked with pride if they were good, user claims

COVERAGE [1]

  1. Mastodon — fosstodon.org TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] ·

    If # AI were any good, people would slap 'watermarks' on themselves. They'd be like "damn girl, this mess was made with GarbageGPT 69.7!! Lookit dat, pleebs!!"

    If # AI were any good, people would slap 'watermarks' on themselves. They'd be like "damn girl, this mess was made with GarbageGPT 69.7!! Lookit dat, pleebs!!" because it'd be so much better than human output. I mean, it has access to infinity bajillion books and posts; it *bette…

RELATED TOPICS