PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 09:31:53

AI governance transparency limited by algorithm registers, study finds

A new paper explores the limitations of algorithm registers in providing transparency for public services, particularly in understanding the sociotechnical systems that govern algorithmic decision-making. Through a case study involving a Dutch city's algorithm register and a decision-support tool for welfare benefits, researchers conducted participatory system mapping workshops with various stakeholders. The findings indicate that algorithm registers alone fail to capture crucial safety hazards and governance issues, highlighting the need for broader stakeholder engagement to achieve effective AI governance and accountability. AI

IMPACT Highlights the need for more comprehensive methods beyond simple registers for effective AI governance and accountability in public services.

RANK_REASON Academic paper on AI governance and system transparency. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on arXiv cs.AI →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

AI governance transparency limited by algorithm registers, study finds

COVERAGE [1]

  1. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · \'I\~nigo de Troya, Maurus Enbergs, Neelke Doorn, Roel Dobbe ·

    Co-constructing sociotechnical AI governance: participatory system mapping using algorithm registers

    arXiv:2608.12166v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Algorithm registers have been championed as a means of providing transparency on the use of algorithms in public services. Yet potential publics differ in their expectations of what should be made transparent and how, as well as i…