A new framework for auditing regulatory responsiveness has been developed, utilizing AI to analyze public comments and their impact on specific regulatory obligations. This framework was applied to over 70,000 comments submitted to 36 EPA rulemakings, revealing that while engagement is associated with modest revisions, the direction of support or opposition does not clearly predict outcomes. The study also found that organizational commenters tend to focus on editorial refinements rather than substantive modifications at a cross-docket level, highlighting an equity asymmetry in the capacity to influence regulations. AI
IMPACT This framework could enable more equitable and effective public participation in regulatory processes by identifying and addressing disparities in commenter capacity.
RANK_REASON Academic paper introducing a new framework and methodology for analyzing regulatory processes. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=0.7]
- alphaXiv
- CatalyzeX
- Connected Papers
- DagsHub
- Gotit.pub
- Hugging Face
- Influence Flower
- Litmaps
- ScienceCast
- scite Smart Citations
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →