AI time-series forecasting benchmarks criticized for favoring deep learning

A new paper argues that current benchmarks for evaluating AI/ML time-series forecasting models are flawed. The authors contend that these benchmarks often favor models adept at learning repetitive patterns, leading to illusory gains and obscuring the effectiveness of simpler classical methods. They propose a two-part solution: updating benchmarks to include more diverse datasets with non-stationarities and requiring deep learning submissions to include robust classical baselines. AI

IMPACT This research could lead to more rigorous and meaningful evaluations of time-series forecasting models, improving the reliability of AI/ML advancements in this domain.

RANK_REASON The cluster contains a research paper published on arXiv discussing methodology for AI/ML model evaluation. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on arXiv cs.AI →

• alphaXiv
• arXiv
• arXivLabs
• CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers
• CORE Recommender
• DagsHub
• Gotit.pub
• Hugging Face
• IArxiv Recommender
• Influence Flower
• Raeid Saqur
• ScienceCast

• paper
• other

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →