PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 00:08:19

Ethan Mollick: AI debate in journals lags future capabilities

By PulseAugur Editorial · [1 sources] ·

Ethan Mollick argues that the current debate surrounding AI in academic journals is too focused on present or past capabilities, rather than future potential. He suggests that the lengthy publication and research process means academic discourse is lagging behind the rapid advancements in AI. AI

IMPACT Suggests a disconnect between AI's rapid evolution and the slower pace of academic discourse.

RANK_REASON Opinion piece by a named credible voice on the pace of AI research and publication.

Read on Bluesky Jetstream — AI desk →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

Ethan Mollick: AI debate in journals lags future capabilities

COVERAGE [1]

  1. Bluesky Jetstream — AI desk TIER_1 English(EN) · emollick.bsky.social ·

    I feel like the debate over AI in academic journals is way too focused on where the capabilities of AI are today (or even where they were a couple years ago) an

    I feel like the debate over AI in academic journals is way too focused on where the capabilities of AI are today (or even where they were a couple years ago) and not nearly focused on where they will almost certainly be in the coming years… … and publication & research takes man…

RELATED ENTITIES

RELATED TOPICS