PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 12:28:49

AI Agents: Algorithmic Mimicry vs. Real Agency Debated

The discussion centers on the nature of AI agents, questioning whether they can be considered "real agents" in the same way living beings are. One perspective suggests that AI agents are not truly human-like and draws a parallel to the mistakes made in neo-classical economics regarding agent-based modeling. This viewpoint implies that current AI might be more akin to algorithmic mimicry than genuine agency. AI

IMPACT Raises questions about the definition and capabilities of AI agents, suggesting they may be limited to algorithmic mimicry rather than true agency.

RANK_REASON The item is an opinion piece discussing the nature of AI agents and drawing parallels to economic modeling.

Read on Mastodon — fosstodon.org →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

AI Agents: Algorithmic Mimicry vs. Real Agency Debated

COVERAGE [1]

  1. Mastodon — fosstodon.org TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] ·

    RE: https:// mastodon.social/@bruces/117065 178931345293 Most importantly though: they are not real agents in the way actual living agents are... so definitely

    RE: https:// mastodon.social/@bruces/117065 178931345293 Most importantly though: they are not real agents in the way actual living agents are... so definitely *not* "human-like." https:// arxiv.org/abs/2307.07515 Seems like we're determined to repeat neo-classical economics' mis…