PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 13:04:35

Defining P(doom): Challenges and a Novel Approach

The concept of P(doom), representing the probability of catastrophic existential risk, is difficult to define using standard methods like betting or forecasting. Betting on doom is problematic because the value of the bet becomes zero if the apocalypse occurs. Forecasting methods can be manipulated by unscrupulous actors. While world models can technically provide probabilities, most people rely on a combination of models and intuition rather than purely mathematical approaches. A proposed alternative definition involves a genie offering a choice between the world progressing as is or a random outcome with a probability 'p' of doom. AI

IMPACT Clarifies a key concept in existential risk discussions, potentially aiding in more precise risk assessment and mitigation strategies.

RANK_REASON The item discusses a conceptual framework for understanding existential risk probabilities, rather than reporting on a specific event or release.

Read on LessWrong (AI tag) →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

Defining P(doom): Challenges and a Novel Approach

How we ranked this

Signal score
0 / 100
Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket
Commentary
The item discusses a conceptual framework for understanding existential risk probabilities, rather than reporting on a specific event or release.
Source corroboration
Single-source cluster
Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics
opinion, safety
Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance
High
Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness
50 days old
Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

Full methodology in our editorial standards.

COVERAGE [1]

  1. LessWrong (AI tag) TIER_1 English(EN) · Christopher King ·

    How to define P(doom) and why it matters

    <p>The usefulness of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P(doom)">p(doom)</a> is <a href="https://www.lesswrong.com/search?query=p%20doom">controversial</a>, but also it is tricky to even <em>define</em> since the usual ways we think about credence don't work with apocalyptic …