PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 18:53:54

Generative AI adoption in qualitative research debated by academics

A new paper explores the complex debate surrounding the use of generative AI in qualitative research. It examines how factors such as research philosophy (positivist vs. non-positivist approaches), required skills, ethical considerations, and personal preferences influence researchers' decisions on whether to incorporate AI tools. The paper aims to provide insights for software engineering researchers engaging with these questions. AI

IMPACT Highlights the ongoing debate and considerations for integrating AI into qualitative research methodologies.

RANK_REASON This is a research paper discussing the application of AI in a specific academic field. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on arXiv cs.AI →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

Generative AI adoption in qualitative research debated by academics

COVERAGE [1]

  1. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Katja Karhu, Kari Smolander, Jussi Kasurinen ·

    To Vibe Research or Not to Vibe Research? Generative AI in Qualitative Research

    arXiv:2605.00922v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: There has been intense debate among qualitative researchers about whether generative AI is suitable for qualitative research. In this paper, we summarize the broader ongoing discussion of generative AI in qualitative research and …