EU AI Law vs. Explainability: Research highlights critical gaps

A new systematic review of academic papers published since 2024 examines the gap between explainable AI (XAI) and the EU's Right to Explanation. The review found that only 19 out of 57 papers demonstrated substantial integration of both legal and technical perspectives, highlighting a lack of interdisciplinary synthesis. Key issues identified include misidentification of the GDPR legal basis, limited engagement with CJEU rulings like Dun & Bradstreet, and conflation of explanation form and content. The paper proposes a framework and research questions to address these challenges, aiming to ensure the Right to Explanation is technically realizable. AI

IMPACT Highlights potential non-compliance with EU AI regulations, impacting how companies must provide explanations for automated decisions.

RANK_REASON The item is a systematic review of academic papers on AI policy and law. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=0.4]

Read on arXiv cs.AI →

• Artificial Intelligence Act
• Court of Justice of the European Union
• Dun & Bradstreet
• EU
• General Data Protection Regulation
• SpaceXAI

• policy
• paper

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →