PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 10:33:36

LLMs can state confidence, but calibration remains a challenge

Researchers are exploring methods to improve the reliability of Large Language Models' (LLMs) self-reported confidence levels. A key technique involves prompting LLMs to explicitly state their confidence as a percentage, which can then be parsed and used to gate or route responses. However, the accuracy of these stated percentages, known as calibration, is crucial and often lacking. Methods like binning predictions by confidence and measuring empirical accuracy, or calculating Expected Calibration Error (ECE), are used to assess this calibration. LLMs tend to be overconfident due to their training data and reinforcement learning, which reward decisive-sounding responses. AI

IMPACT Improves LLM response reliability by enabling better gating and routing of uncertain answers.

RANK_REASON The item discusses a novel method for improving LLM output reliability through explicit confidence scoring and calibration, which is a research topic. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on dev.to — LLM tag →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

LLMs can state confidence, but calibration remains a challenge

COVERAGE [1]

  1. dev.to — LLM tag TIER_1 English(EN) · Devanshu Biswas ·

    Verbalized confidence: make an LLM state how sure it is, then check if 90% really means 90%

    <p>Ask a model a question and it answers with the same flat certainty whether it knows the capital of Australia or is guessing a coin-flip. Verbalized confidence fixes half of that: you ask it to attach an explicit self-estimate — "Answer: Canberra, Confidence: 90%." That single …