PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 14:02:36

AI Conference Reviews Under Scrutiny for Excessive Demands

A discussion on the r/MachineLearning subreddit questions whether conference reviews are asking too much from authors. Specifically, reviewers are reportedly requesting lengthy additions that extend the scope of papers beyond their stated limits, often requiring these additions to be placed in supplemental materials. This practice raises concerns about whether such extensive revisions are more suited for journal publications rather than conference submissions, with one user noting they retracted a paper due to these concerns to avoid blocking a future journal publication. AI

IMPACT Raises questions about the current standards and practices in AI research publication venues.

RANK_REASON Discussion on a subreddit about academic review practices.

Read on r/MachineLearning →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

AI Conference Reviews Under Scrutiny for Excessive Demands

COVERAGE [1]

  1. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/examachine ·

    Conference Reviews: Asking Too Much? [D]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>There's a kind of review that asks for lengthy additions, usually extending the scope of the paper beyond the stated, even though the submission is at page limit. Naturally, such additions in the case of top-tier conferences have to go into the s…