A discussion on the r/MachineLearning subreddit questions whether conference reviews are asking too much from authors. Specifically, reviewers are reportedly requesting lengthy additions that extend the scope of papers beyond their stated limits, often requiring these additions to be placed in supplemental materials. This practice raises concerns about whether such extensive revisions are more suited for journal publications rather than conference submissions, with one user noting they retracted a paper due to these concerns to avoid blocking a future journal publication. AI
IMPACT Raises questions about the current standards and practices in AI research publication venues.
RANK_REASON Discussion on a subreddit about academic review practices.
- Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems
- International Conference on Learning Representations
- International Conference on Machine Learning
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →