A user on Reddit's r/LocalLLaMA subreddit shared results from running the Deepseek V4 Flash model on the SlopCodeBench benchmark. The user compared its performance to Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.8 and an unreleased Claude Opus 5, indicating that Deepseek V4 Flash performed better than Claude Opus 4.8 but was surpassed by Claude Opus 5. The benchmark results were posted on GitHub, with the user expressing interest in re-running the tests on their MacBook once the Q2 models are available. AI
IMPACT Provides a comparative performance metric for coding tasks, indicating Deepseek V4 Flash's capabilities relative to Anthropic's models.
RANK_REASON User-generated benchmark results comparing LLM performance on a coding task. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →
