A university professor shared their frustration with the academic conference review process, stating it has deterred potential PhD students. The professor noted that three students declined to pursue a PhD due to the perceived difficulties and frustrations of paper submissions, while a fourth was nearly lost over similar concerns. Despite having strong research and publication experience, the professor found that papers without obvious flaws were subjected to arbitrary reviewer feedback, leading to endless resubmission cycles and discouraging students from continuing in research. AI
IMPACT The frustrations described may discourage new talent from entering AI research fields.
RANK_REASON The item is a personal opinion piece about the academic review process, not a direct announcement or event.
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →
