PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 08:29:09

Workshop paper accepted, but reviewers request new experiments post-acceptance

By PulseAugur Editorial · [1 sources] ·

A researcher is seeking advice after their paper was accepted to a workshop, but reviewers requested additional experiments for the camera-ready version. The user questions the purpose of this request, as it bypasses the standard peer review process. They are considering whether to perform the experiments, ignore the request, or contact the workshop organizers for clarification. AI

RANK_REASON The cluster discusses a research paper submission and reviewer feedback, fitting the 'research' bucket. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=0.4]

Read on r/MachineLearning →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

Workshop paper accepted, but reviewers request new experiments post-acceptance

COVERAGE [1]

  1. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/rokk07 ·

    Workshop paper accepted, reviewers asked new experiments [D]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi everyone, I submitted a paper to a workshop co-located with a top conference. The paper was accepted, but reviewers are requesting additional experiments. The issue is that there's no second review phasem, I only need to submit a camera-ready …

RELATED TOPICS