A new study published on arXiv investigates how large language models name individual professionals in their responses, finding that models named an individual in 25.8% of queries. The research, which used 2,400 grounded API calls across four models including GPT-5.6 Sol and Gemini 3.6 Flash, revealed significant differences between models and categories, with real estate and car dealerships seeing higher naming rates. Interestingly, the type of citation, rather than citation volume, predicted naming, and prompts in English led to more individual mentions than local languages. AI
IMPACT This research highlights how LLMs attribute information, potentially impacting how AI models are evaluated for bias and transparency.
RANK_REASON The cluster contains a research paper published on arXiv detailing empirical findings about LLM behavior. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
Read on arXiv cs.IR (Information Retrieval) →
- alphaXiv
- arXiv
- CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers
- Connected Papers
- DagsHub
- Gemini 3.6 Flash
- Gotit.pub
- GPT-5.6 "Sol"
- Grok 4.5
- Hugging Face
- Litmaps
- Perplexity sonar-pro
- scite Smart Citations
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 2 sources. How we write summaries →