PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 20:49:50

Mastodon user argues local LLMs don't violate privacy

A user on Mastodon argued against the notion that locally run Large Language Models (LLMs) using publicly available data infringe on privacy. They cited Apertus AI as an example, stating that the technology relies on complex mathematics rather than massive privacy breaches. The user criticized those who condemn the technology without understanding it, calling such views ignorant. AI

IMPACT This commentary suggests a perspective on AI privacy concerns, highlighting the debate around data usage in locally run LLMs.

RANK_REASON The item is a social media post expressing an opinion on LLM privacy implications.

Read on Mastodon — mastodon.social →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

Mastodon user argues local LLMs don't violate privacy

COVERAGE [1]

  1. Mastodon — mastodon.social TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] ·

    @ r_alb Please stop claiming that locally run LLMs based on publicly available data would infringe on anyone's privacy. See for example https://www. apertus-ai.

    @ r_alb Please stop claiming that locally run LLMs based on publicly available data would infringe on anyone's privacy. See for example https://www. apertus-ai.org The technology is not based on massive breaches of privacy but on complex mathematics. If you have no idea about the…