A new paper proposes a theory that human participation in automated tasks may persist even with highly capable AI systems. The theory suggests three reasons for this persistence: technical complementarity where humans offer unique capabilities, normative grounds related to human agency and learning, and emergence grounds where the target of the activity is defined through interaction. This perspective implies that human-AI co-construction is a fundamental aspect of certain activities, not just a temporary solution to AI limitations. AI
IMPACT Suggests that human-AI collaboration will remain crucial, influencing the design and ethics of future AI systems.
RANK_REASON The cluster contains a single academic paper discussing a theoretical framework for AI and human interaction. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
Read on arXiv cs.MA (Multiagent) →
- alphaXiv
- arXiv
- CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers
- CORE Recommender
- DagsHub
- Gotit.pub
- Hugging Face
- Influence Flower
- ScienceCast
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →