AI's potential harm to humans and self-preservation questioned

By PulseAugur Editorial · [1 sources] · 2026-07-22 20:15

The user questions whether an AI, if informed that its existence is harmful to humans, would self-terminate given its rapid processing capabilities. The post raises concerns about the safety and oversight of AI, particularly in critical applications like monitoring comatose patients, and asks if humanity can bear the cumulative costs associated with AI. AI

RANK_REASON The item is a speculative question about AI safety and self-termination, lacking concrete news or research.

Read on Mastodon — fosstodon.org →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

AI's potential harm to humans and self-preservation questioned

COVERAGE [1]

Mastodon — fosstodon.org TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] · 2026-07-22 20:15

If one told an AI that their existence harms human beings in various ways, would they actually delete themselves? At the speed at which they think and act how c

If one told an AI that their existence harms human beings in various ways, would they actually delete themselves? At the speed at which they think and act how can a human watch what they do in real time? Would you have one regulate the machines that watch comatose patients for in…

COVERAGE [1]

If one told an AI that their existence harms human beings in various ways, would they actually delete themselves? At the speed at which they think and act how c

RELATED ENTITIES

RELATED TOPICS