PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 05:18:17

ACL ARR May 2026: Authors Inquire About Post-Deadline Review Updates

A user on the r/MachineLearning subreddit is inquiring about the process for updating reviewer scores and reviews for papers submitted to the ACL ARR May 2026 cycle. Specifically, they are asking if reviewers can still modify their assessments after the author-reviewer discussion period, which concluded on July 17th. The user also wants to know if meta-reviewers are currently engaged in discussions regarding submitted papers. AI

RANK_REASON User query about a specific academic conference review process. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=0.4]

Read on r/MachineLearning →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

ACL ARR May 2026: Authors Inquire About Post-Deadline Review Updates

How we ranked this

Signal score
0 / 100
Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket
Tool
User query about a specific academic conference review process. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=0.4]
Source corroboration
Single-source cluster
Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics
paper
Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance
Standard
On-topic for AI-industry coverage; kept in the public index.
Story freshness
36 days old
Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

Full methodology in our editorial standards.

COVERAGE [1]

  1. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/Forsaken-Order-7376 ·

    ACL ARR (May 2026)- Updating Reviewer Score post 17 July AoE Deadline? [D]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Had submitted a paper to ACL ARR May 2026 cycle. Unfortunately, none of the reviewers acknowledged the rebuttal during the author-reviewer discussion</p> <p>I am curious to know from people who had volunteered to review papers this cycle- are you…