Generative AI viewed as historical art process, not rupture

This paper frames generative artificial intelligence not as a new technological leap, but as a large-scale manifestation of historical processes in art creation. It proposes a taxonomy of generative systems and identifies systemic risks like model collapse, suggesting environmental enrichment as a countermeasure. The role of the artist is redefined from a craftsman to a systems designer and curator, with creative agency residing in humans distributed along the AI pipeline. AI

IMPACT Reframes generative AI as an evolution of historical artistic processes rather than a novel rupture.

RANK_REASON The item is an academic paper discussing generative AI's historical context and risks. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on arXiv cs.AI →

• alphaXiv
• arXiv
• Benjaminian aura
• CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers
• CORE Recommender
• DagsHub
• generative artificial intelligence
• Gotit.pub
• Hugging Face
• Influence Flower
• model collapse
• ScienceCast

• paper
• other

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →