PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 04:11:28

Cursor IDE users question AI agent workflow without code review

A user on Reddit's r/cursor subreddit is questioning the workflow of using AI agents, specifically within the Cursor IDE, without direct code review. They express concern about the potential for these agents to create "black boxes" that users may not fully understand or control. The user contrasts this with their current method of step-by-step integration and line-by-line acceptance of AI suggestions, wondering if they are missing a more efficient trend or becoming overly reliant on a less transparent process. AI

IMPACT Raises questions about user control and understanding of AI-driven development tools.

RANK_REASON Discussion about a specific IDE's features and user workflow.

Read on r/cursor →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

Cursor IDE users question AI agent workflow without code review

COVERAGE [1]

  1. r/cursor TIER_2 English(EN) · /u/PietroBastas ·

    How you can work without IDE?

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I see more and more tools, Cursor recently, sponsor their &quot;agent view&quot; only. I wonder, how you can work without reviewing the actual code modified by the agent ? Do you just ask and let it run and hope for the best ? Isn't that a way to…