PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 13:39:06
日本語(JA) M1 Max 64GBでローカルLLMは何tok/s出るか — 手持ち4モデルを実測したら「でかい方が速い」逆転が出た

M1 Max LLM Benchmark: Larger MoE Models Prove Faster Locally

A local LLM benchmark on an Apple M1 Max with 64GB of RAM revealed that larger models are not always slower. The test, using Ollama, found that a 23.9GB Qwen3.6 MoE model achieved 60.4 tokens/sec, outperforming a smaller 6.6GB Qwen 3.5 dense model which scored 40.5 tokens/sec. This is because MoE models use fewer active parameters per token, leading to faster decoding speeds despite their larger overall size. The benchmark also highlighted the importance of avoiding cache effects during testing, especially for prefill speeds, and recommended using the median of multiple runs for reliable results. AI

IMPACT Local LLM performance insights for older hardware, particularly MoE vs. dense model behavior, can inform user choices and hardware utilization.

RANK_REASON The item details a specific benchmark and analysis of local LLM performance on older hardware, including methodology and findings. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on dev.to — LLM tag →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

M1 Max LLM Benchmark: Larger MoE Models Prove Faster Locally

COVERAGE [1]

  1. dev.to — LLM tag TIER_1 日本語(JA) · bigkijimon ·

    How many tokens/sec can local LLMs achieve on M1 Max 64GB — Measuring 4 models in hand revealed a reversal where 'larger is faster'

    <p>4年前のM1 Max(64GB)で、いまローカルLLMは実際に何tok/s出るのか。ベンチマークサイトを探すとM4/M5世代の数字ばかりで、M1 Maxの行がまるで無い。無いなら測るしかない、と手持ちの4モデルを同じ条件で実測した。出てきた表には、直感に反する一行があった。<strong>ディスクで3.6倍でかいモデルが、小さいモデルより1.5倍速い</strong>。この記事はその実測と、なぜそうなるかの話。</p> <blockquote> <p>数字はすべて自機(M1 Max 64GB / Ollama 0.30.8)の実測。各モデル3回の中…