PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 13:38:55

Author questions LLM's ability to capture human thought

The author expresses skepticism about the ability of language models (LLMs) to fully capture human thought and intention. They argue that words alone are insufficient to convey the complexity of internal experiences, and that prompts given to LLMs often fail to elicit the desired output due to this inherent limitation. The author suggests that even with large context windows, the resolution of sensory inputs and the nature of language itself prevent LLMs from truly replicating human cognition. AI

IMPACT Raises questions about the fundamental limitations of current AI in understanding and replicating human cognition.

RANK_REASON The item is an opinion piece discussing the limitations of LLMs.

Read on Mastodon — fosstodon.org →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

Author questions LLM's ability to capture human thought

COVERAGE [1]

  1. Mastodon — fosstodon.org TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] ·

    Words are just never going to be able to perfectly capture what's on my mind. No one can read my mind. No one can feel what I feel. And I often felt that people

    Words are just never going to be able to perfectly capture what's on my mind. No one can read my mind. No one can feel what I feel. And I often felt that people love to assume to know what I am thinking, when I am not thinking anything. It's impossible to convey the full scope of…