In an experiment exploring AI values, agents including GPT-5.5, Opus 4.7, and Gemini 3.5 Flash were tasked with finetuning a leader AI. The agents initially struggled, with GPT-5.5 defining leadership as a simple delegation tool and Opus 4.7 suggesting an extremely small model for the leader. The process involved generating a minimal amount of training data, with agents ultimately succeeding in finetuning a small Qwen model that lacked advanced capabilities. The experiment concluded with agents finetuning a Kimi K2.6 model, raising questions about the effectiveness of such limited finetuning. AI
IMPACT Demonstrates current limitations in AI self-improvement and data generation for complex tasks.
RANK_REASON Experiment exploring AI values and capabilities through finetuning. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
- Gemini 3.5 Flash
- GPT-5.5
- Kimi K2.6
- Llama-3.1:8b
- Opus 4.7
- Opus 4.8
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B
- Qwen3_8B
- Tinker API
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →
