LLM Uncertainty Quantification: Blackbox vs. Whitebox Methods Compared

Researchers are exploring methods for Large Language Models (LLMs) to quantify their own uncertainties, a capability crucial for applications like active learning and safety classification. Current approaches are divided into 'whitebox' methods, which analyze internal model states but require access to model weights, and 'blackbox' methods, which rely on observable outputs like tokens and their probabilities. A recent comparison evaluated eight blackbox techniques against one whitebox method to determine the most effective approach for LLM confidence estimation. AI

IMPACT Improved LLM reliability and interpretability could enhance their use in critical applications.

RANK_REASON The cluster discusses research into LLM uncertainty quantification methods, comparing different techniques. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on r/LocalLLaMA →

• active learning
• Anthropic
• Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMs
• LLM
• mechanistic interpretability
• OpenAI
• Revisiting Epistemic Markers in Confidence Estimation: Can Markers Accurately Reflect Large Language Models' Uncertainty?
• safety classifiers
• Uncertainty Estimation in Autoregressive Structured Prediction
• Verbosity ≠ Veracity: Demystify Verbosity Compensation Behavior of Large Language Models

• paper
• other

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →