PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 00:52:30

AI agent failures cataloged in new public database

A new public database, the ARE Incident Database, has been launched to catalog real-world AI agent failures. The database details 32 incidents, mapping them to the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative Top 10 categories. The creator's own security product, agentx-security-sdk, can block 23 of these incidents, with partial coverage for two more, leaving four categories unaddressed. Each incident includes a reproducible code snippet to allow users to verify the claims themselves. AI

IMPACT Provides a verifiable way to test AI agent security claims, potentially improving industry trust and best practices.

RANK_REASON The item describes a new product/database for AI agent security, including reproducible examples.

Read on dev.to — LLM tag →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

AI agent failures cataloged in new public database

How we ranked this

Signal score
0 / 100
Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket
Tool
The item describes a new product/database for AI agent security, including reproducible examples.
Source corroboration
Single-source cluster
Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics
product, safety
Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance
High
Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness
57 days old
Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

Full methodology in our editorial standards.

COVERAGE [1]

  1. dev.to — LLM tag TIER_1 English(EN) · Vasu Dalal ·

    I catalogued 32 real AI-agent failures, then marked the ones we cannot stop

    <p>Every agent-security vendor tells you what they block. Nobody tells you what they miss.</p> <p>That gap is the whole problem. "We stop prompt injection" is a claim you cannot check. You cannot run it, and you cannot tell it apart from the next company saying the same sentence.…