Paper defines criteria for effective AI and computer science benchmarks

A new paper titled "Good Benchmarks" outlines criteria for effective evaluation tasks in artificial intelligence and computer science. The authors emphasize that ideal benchmarks should be accurate, solvable, verifiable, clearly defined, and challenging in meaningful ways. They advocate for tasks that mirror real-world problems faced by experienced practitioners and are tested based on outcomes rather than specific methodologies. AI

IMPACT Establishes a framework for creating more effective and meaningful evaluation tasks in AI research.

RANK_REASON The item is a research paper published on arXiv detailing criteria for benchmarks. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on arXiv cs.AI →

• alphaXiv
• artificial intelligence
• arXiv
• arXivLabs
• CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers
• computer science
• Connected Papers
• CORE Recommender
• DagsHub
• Gotit.pub
• Hugging Face
• Influence Flower
• Litmaps
• ScienceCast
• scite Smart Citations

• paper
• other

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →